As stated in “Navigation Plan 2013-2017,” this is the CNO’s Position Report for 2012. It describes the U.S. Navy’s progress toward the vision identified in the CNO’s Sailing Directions. The CNO Sailing Directions are sound and remain the foundation for planning and decision making. Similar to what the USN does at sea (for example, the Eight O’ Clock Report), this Position Report “takes a fix” on where the Nay is today and identifies “course and speed” changes to keep it on track and counter the effects of “set and drift” – emerging challenges that will tend to take the USN off track.
The main points are aligned with the CNO’s Tenets from his Sailing Directions.
Warfighting First - We will develop strategies and capabilities to command the sea and project power. As described in our Air-Sea Battle Concept we will enhance enduring U.S. advantages and create new ones to overcome threats to our freedom of action and exploit our adversaries’ vulnerabilities.
- We will continue developing, fielding and integrating unmanned air vehicles into air wings including X-47B UCAS-D and UCLASS.
- We will sustain our undersea dominance by implementing a networked approach including aircraft, subs, off-board sensors, communications and unmanned vehicles.
- We will accelerate fielding of procedures and systems to make the electromagnetic spectrum and cyberspace a primary warfighting domain.
- With the other sea services we will revise our maritime strategy, “A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower”, to address the challenges and threats facing us in the near future.
- We will develop concepts to guide future amphibious operations, building on the ongoing “Single Naval Battle” effort with the Marine Corps.
- We will describe “How We Fight” in detail with a book-length project to educate the force and guide future doctrine and operational concepts.
Operate Forward - We will ensure the ability of our forces to sustainably operate forward at the maritime crossroads with relevant warfighting capability.
- We will reconcile our global responsibilities for presence with the need for reasonable individual tempo and sustainable training and maintenance plans.
- We will deploy USS FREEDOM to Singapore in early 2013 and complete work to homeport the first two destroyers in Rota, Spain in 2014.
- We will station three additional patrol craft in Bahrain with rotating crews and permanently homeport in Bahrain the crews of four minesweepers, complemented by new minesweeping systems that expand their capability.
Be Ready - We will continue to focus on the proficiency and confidence of today’s fleet with today’s systems and weapons, while addressing factors that detract from safety and readiness.
- We will monitor and sustain the “Health of the Force;” in particular we will restore tracking of individual operational tempo (ITEMPO) alongside other measurements.
- We will develop and implement strategies to attack sexual assault and suicide.
- We will raise the number of Sailors at sea and address fleet manning “fit” deficiencies in an enduring way.
- We will implement a comprehensive plan of action to integrate LCS-class ships into the fleet, led by an “LCS Council.”
We have already seen movement on this position report with the deployment to the Western Pacific of the USS FREEDOM; much work remains in the area of sexual assault and suicide.
Incoming search terms:mattcegelske com: position report, admiral greenerts position report, admiral greenhart position report, greenerts position report, mattcegelske position report, Navy CNO Electro Magnetic spectrum maneuver
Star Trek: The Next Generation Motion Picture Collection (First Contact / Generations / Insurrection / Nemesis) [Blu-ray] is available from Amazon for $26.49 as the Deal of the Day. Always excellent to get The Next Generation of
Geekery Star Trek on Blu-ray with the full High Definition video and Audio. You won’t get this high of quality via streaming yet!
Incoming search terms:Star Trek: The Next Generation Motion Picture Collection (First Contact / Generations / Insurrection / Nemesis) [Blu-ray]
Valve’s Handbook (of Half Life and Left 4 Dead notoriety) for New Employees was let loose recently on the Internet. So as any good Cyber geek I had to take a look at this fine software makers internal thought process. I must say their thinking is quite impressive and shows how they’ve come so far in the relatively short time they’ve been a company. There are several connections and similarities, between Valve and the U.S. Navy & U.S. Military, I see that I’d like to expound on.
“Flatland” Empowerment - This picture says everything about the organization. Challenges the legacy regime of full hierarchy of an organization and empowers every individual to ensure they represent the company. The Navy, like it’s sister services, attempts to place the responsibility upon each of it’s members while maintaining the organizational hierarchy. More than any time in history we are seeing young people fully engaged on a global scale and making a massive difference in the world, yet numerous leaders discount this impressive untapped resource and capability.
“We’ve heard that other companies have people allocate a percentage of their time to self-directed projects. At Valve, that percentage is 100.” - Valve Handbook for New Employees
Risk - Failure as a “massive learning” experience mentality. With Valve they are taught to make predictions and anticipate nasty outcomes as we are with the Military (at some level -not every individual unfortunately). ”What would I expect if I’m right?” and “What would I expect if I’m wrong?” are two main mantras each individual is trained to understand and embrace. Then ensure they bounce these ideas and possibilities off of each other to ensure they match reality. Too often within our Navy there is a fear of embarrassing situations instead of fearlessness.
Peer Reviews & Stack ranking (and compensation) - The Navy has operated off a supervisory review model for it’s entire history. Yes it leaves a bit up to navigating the peer environment, a possible ranking board for recommendation by mid-level supervisors to Senior raters, or solely up to the Senior rater to ensure success. In my short time with the Navy I’ve yet to see any peer ranking taken into account in the overall review process. I think this would ensure a bit more interaction between peers. I know I’ve seen issues both within my peer group and higher levels. I think this has the ability to remove the “ego effect” or “negative personality” component out of the peer interaction level and make us, the Navy, significantly more effective. I would also change the bonus structure within the Navy. It would shift from solely role based (Nuclear power, Aviation, Surface Warfare) to key role and performance hybrid. I know too many individuals that “try” merely to achieve a locked in bonus then significantly “relax” once it’s obtained. This isn’t how a bonus structure should operate nor should it be how our tax dollars are expended. I do like how their ranking structure is broken out:
- Skill Level/Technical Ability
- Group Contribution
- Product Contribution
We believe that high-performance people are generally self-improving. - Valve Handbook for New Employees
Employee Development consists of these mantras:
- Engineers: code is only the beginning
- Non-Engineers: program or be programmed
It is as simple as that. I believe this is just like what I’ve experienced at Carnegie Mellon University. Everyone needs to understand how programming works if not program themselves. This self improving mantra is very much like that I’ve seen in the U.S. Military and Navy. Those that can effectively educate themselves to ensure they have the correct balance at the time and through their career are often the most successful.
Hiring - If you haven’t noticed the U.S. Military isn’t having any issues with hiring, firing or retention. We’re full up actually. But are we being selective enough in this period? I don’t believe we are and believe that we could be adjusting better to meet our current and future needs in a much better fashion. We’re in a period where we’ve not adjusted fast enough and have already had to separate individuals because of it through Enlisted Review Boards (ERB) and a similar Officer separation program.
Lastly I’ll leave you with a final image. It represents the main similarity between the Military, Navy and Valve. But too often we’re allowing our people within the Navy to forget their expertise and default to the wide general areas. This cannot continue into this more stringent and efficiency based era.
Incoming search terms:naval leaders
Follow A Cyber Fellow on Twitter!
"Graphics Chips Help Process Big Data Sets in Milliseconds" http://t.co/mIxHC0Avfk
"Ship Tracking Hack Makes Tankers Vanish from View" http://t.co/IS29FY5kwU
"MakerBot Thingiverse gets an iOS app for perusing 3D-printing projects on the go" http://t.co/M05RSVlgX0
"Arbour Networks has published ATLAS Q3 2013 DDoS report" http://t.co/8KQ9s6fFSX
"Trend Micro Finds Vulnerabilities in Java, Patched in Latest Oracle Update" http://t.co/a72tozCPZ8
"Universities Schooled By Malware: Higher Ed Networks 300 Percent More Infected" http://t.co/zAUBY18F4x
"Can the Internet of Things make itself secure?" http://t.co/jGcCCDMDya