“Yours is the profession of arms, the will to win, the sure knowledge that in war there is no substitute for victory, that if you lose, the Nation will be destroyed, that the very obsession of your public service must be Duty, Honor, Country.” – General Douglas MacArthur [farewell speech to West Point Cadets in May of 1962]
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, starts out a recent America’s Military – A Profession of Arms White Paper that encourages us to “renew our commitment to the Profession of Arms” to continue to shape Joint Force 2020.
The Key components of the paper are:
- The Military Profession
- Leadership as the Foundation – Strengthening our Profession of Arms
- Mission Command
- Jointness – Strength from Diversity
- The Way Ahead – Advancing the Profession of Arms
Incoming search terms:admiral arleigh burke said that command by negation was important because, cjcs dempsey mission command white paper, command by negation, command by negation navy term, general dempsey and jointness, General Martin Dempsey Profession of Arms Speech, yours is the profession of arms
I made this video of CJCS Gen. Martin E. Dempsey’s Commencement Speech at Norwich University, May 2012.
I enjoyed reading through this inspirational speech toward an Uncommon Life and to Start Delivering but obviously found a flaw in our current Chairman… he’s a Yankee Fan. Well, as he notes…everyone has a flaw and this is his. I’ll forgive a bit of it since he has achieved Duke Alumnus status.
Go Boston Red Sox!
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, starts out a recent Mission Command White Paper that focuses on development of the 2020 Joint Force with:
“Mission command is the conduct of military operations through decentralized execution based upon mission-type orders. Successful mission command demands that subordinate leaders at all echelons exercise disciplined initiative and act aggressively and independently to accomplish the mission.” – Joint Publication 3-0 “Joint Operations” 11 AUG 2011
Immediately delving into the root of what Mission Command, commander’s intent, command by negation (used by the U.S. Navy and may come with some cockiness), centralized planning, decentralized execution the Chairman looks to move the “empowerment bar” back a bit more toward the tactical level. Sounds much like I described in Developing Naval Leaders: A Gamer’s Method. This will be critical as our Military forces must remain empowered to execute operations against an adversary in their tactical specific realm. He goes further to note that these models of command must be complimented by adept and adaptable leaders at every level.
“The relevance of space and cyberspace to national security will grow exponentially in magnitude of importance. Our reliance on technological superiority is a potential vulnerability that our adversaries will seek to exploit, often in covert or indirect ways.”
I wrote about Technology-Centric Warfare supported by Information-Centricity and one of its main points was the technological superiority aspect that the U.S. Military has always relied upon. The Chairman also notes that the “pace of change” and the “speed of operations” will only increase. This brief statement has a very large and monolithic challenge hidden within. The human element, for the most part, has been relatively constant with its ability to learn & understand. This then translates to a fairly constant speed at which we’re able to change and adapt both individually and organizationally.
“Smaller, lighter forces operating in an environment of increased uncertainty, complexity and competitiveness will require freedom of action to develop the situation and rapidly exploit opportunities. Decentralization will occur beyond current comfort levels and habits of practice.”
This conceptual statement dies rapidly at the staffing level, within the Navy, if not assured by the Commander’s authority and responsibility. But is in the “spirit” of John Boyd’s Observe-orient-decide-act or “OODA Loop” cycle.
Much of this cyclical process is based on the empowered Commander’s ability to understand and ensure trust both up and down the echelon scale. These abilities will then foster the capability to provide “superior speed in competitive cycles of decision making;” a significant necessity I’ve seen numerous leaders state requirements for yet goes without being addressed. To instill this ability should we be supplementing the education our leaders receive with something like Carnegie Mellon’s Decision Sciences or Strategy, Entrepreneurship, and Technological Change?
What I do know is that while we routinely enjoy being in communication with subordinate units, the next higher echelon, and the planet the Military and Navy are not ready to execute without that tether. A far cry from our history.
“Any commander who fails to exceed his authority is not of much use to his subordinates.” – Admiral Arleigh Burke
Incoming search terms:mission command white paper, mission command white paper dempsey, Dempsey Mission Command White Paper, mission command 2020, dempsey mission command, Gen Dempsey White Paper, GEN Dempsey Martin “Mission Command White Paper” Chairman Joints Chief of Staff White Paper 3 April 2012, dempsey white paper, the conduct of military operations through decentralized execution, mission command navy, the white paper by dempsey, The Mission General Dempsey April 2012
Follow A Cyber Fellow on Twitter!
2015 Annual Goals: Q1 Review http://t.co/ZquTNhbqW4
The Great Chinese Lie About Taiwan http://t.co/QuPXPIAM0y
World Order was an exceptional book. Now on to something with a bit more grit. Reading http://t.co/0eNncatr7f
A Cyber Fellow Reading List http://t.co/fKLHRPClKI
Never stand up when you can sit down - A Cyber Fellow http://t.co/FzWzKrnLpR
Two vessels and two questions - A Cyber Fellow http://t.co/bwQcPHEtA2